IIJC

International Institute of Jesus Christ

Matthew 3

Translated straight from the SBLGNT, with the grounds of every decision on the page.

1
Ἐν δὲ ταῖς ἡμέραις ἐκείναις παραγίνεται Ἰωάννης ὁ βαπτιστὴς κηρύσσων ἐν τῇ ἐρήμῳ τῆς Ἰουδαίας
In those days John the Baptist appears, proclaiming in the wilderness of Judea
2
⸀καὶ λέγων· Μετανοεῖτε, ἤγγικεν γὰρ ἡ βασιλεία τῶν οὐρανῶν.
and saying, “Repent, for the kingdom of the heavens has come near.”
Why this rendering

Matt.3.2 Observation

Syntactic observation

ἡ βασιλεία τῶν οὐρανῶν — the kingdom of the heavens. Counted inside this corpus the split is sharp: Matthew uses this phrase 32 times and the kingdom of God only four (12:28, 19:24, 21:31, 21:43); Mark uses the kingdom of God 14 times and the kingdom of the heavens never; Luke uses the kingdom of God 31 times and the kingdom of the heavens never. Of the four Gospels only Matthew uses the phrase. They divide even in the same scene — the proclamation at Mark 1:15 is ἡ βασιλεία τοῦ θεοῦ, while Matthew 3:2 and 4:17 have ἡ βασιλεία τῶν οὐρανῶν. οὐρανός stands in the plural (τῶν οὐρανῶν), and that plural is itself Matthew's habit. ἤγγικεν is perfect — it has come near and stands near; the same perfect sits at the same point in Mark 1:15. Μετανοεῖτε is present imperative plural — not turn once but keep turning. SBLGNT marks a variant in this verse (⸀καὶ).

Rendering options · 2

Adopted
“the kingdom of the heavens has come near” — kept distinct from Mark's kingdom of God

Basis Two different phrases get two different renderings, plural included — the habits of the two authors are visible only if they can be counted.

“the kingdom of heaven is at hand”

Basis Uses the settled rendering.

Rejected 천국 has hardened into a single word in which the heavens are no longer visible, and it reads as a place. The Greek does not locate the kingdom in heaven; it names it with a heaven-word.

Lost in translation

heavens in the plural

A Semitic plural for the sky carried into Greek; Korean 하늘 and English heaven tend to read singular.

Survives in · YLT
3
οὗτος γάρ ἐστιν ὁ ῥηθεὶς ⸀διὰ Ἠσαΐου τοῦ προφήτου λέγοντος· Φωνὴ βοῶντος ἐν τῇ ἐρήμῳ· Ἑτοιμάσατε τὴν ὁδὸν κυρίου, εὐθείας ποιεῖτε τὰς τρίβους αὐτοῦ.
For this is the one spoken of through Isaiah the prophet, saying: “A voice of one crying in the wilderness: prepare the way of the Lord, make his paths straight.”
4
αὐτὸς δὲ ὁ Ἰωάννης εἶχεν τὸ ἔνδυμα αὐτοῦ ἀπὸ τριχῶν καμήλου καὶ ζώνην δερματίνην περὶ τὴν ὀσφὺν αὐτοῦ, ἡ δὲ τροφὴ ⸂ἦν αὐτοῦ⸃ ἀκρίδες καὶ μέλι ἄγριον.
Now John himself had his clothing from camel's hair and a leather belt around his waist, and his food was locusts and wild honey.
5
τότε ἐξεπορεύετο πρὸς αὐτὸν Ἱεροσόλυμα καὶ πᾶσα ἡ Ἰουδαία καὶ πᾶσα ἡ περίχωρος τοῦ Ἰορδάνου,
Then Jerusalem and all Judea and all the region around the Jordan were going out to him,
6
καὶ ἐβαπτίζοντο ἐν τῷ Ἰορδάνῃ ⸀ποταμῷ ὑπ’ αὐτοῦ ἐξομολογούμενοι τὰς ἁμαρτίας αὐτῶν.
and they were being baptized by him in the river Jordan, confessing their sins.
7
Ἰδὼν δὲ πολλοὺς τῶν Φαρισαίων καὶ Σαδδουκαίων ἐρχομένους ἐπὶ τὸ βάπτισμα ⸀αὐτοῦ εἶπεν αὐτοῖς· Γεννήματα ἐχιδνῶν, τίς ὑπέδειξεν ὑμῖν φυγεῖν ἀπὸ τῆς μελλούσης ὀργῆς;
But seeing many of the Pharisees and Sadducees coming to his baptism, he said to them, “Offspring of vipers, who warned you to flee from the coming wrath?
Why this rendering

Matt.3.7 Observation

Syntactic observation

Γεννήματα ἐχιδνῶν — offspring of vipers; literally, things fathered by vipers. γέννημα is the noun of γεννάω, the root that ran through thirty-nine fathered's in ch. 1. A book that opened with a genealogy uses that same root three chapters later for an address that denies lineage — and two verses on, at v.9, the contrast is made explicit: do not say we have Abraham as father, for God can raise children to Abraham from these stones. The chain of begetting filled the book's first chapter, and the Baptist says the chain guarantees nothing. γέννημα occurs three times in Matthew, all three the same address (3:7, 12:34, 23:33), and Luke 3:7 has the identical address in this same scene — four places in the corpus. But only Matthew put a chain of begetting first, so only in Matthew does the address answer back to the book's own opening chapter. And the hearers are bracketed together as Pharisees and Sadducees, a pairing found here in Matthew. SBLGNT marks a variant in this verse (⸀αὐτοῦ).

Rendering options · 2

Adopted
“offspring of vipers”

Basis Keeps the γεννάω root visible so it joins ch. 1 and v.9.

“brood of vipers”

Basis Uses the settled, natural rendering.

Rejected The sense is the same, but 자식 and brood carry no fathering root, so the address stops answering back to the genealogy of ch. 1 — and that echo is the content here.

8
ποιήσατε οὖν καρπὸν ἄξιον τῆς μετανοίας
Produce, then, fruit worthy of repentance;
9
καὶ μὴ δόξητε λέγειν ἐν ἑαυτοῖς· Πατέρα ἔχομεν τὸν Ἀβραάμ, λέγω γὰρ ὑμῖν ὅτι δύναται ὁ θεὸς ἐκ τῶν λίθων τούτων ἐγεῖραι τέκνα τῷ Ἀβραάμ.
and do not presume to say among yourselves, ‘We have Abraham as father.' For I say to you that God is able from these stones to raise up children to Abraham.
10
ἤδη ⸀δὲ ἡ ἀξίνη πρὸς τὴν ῥίζαν τῶν δένδρων κεῖται· πᾶν οὖν δένδρον μὴ ποιοῦν καρπὸν καλὸν ἐκκόπτεται καὶ εἰς πῦρ βάλλεται.
Already the axe is laid at the root of the trees; so every tree not producing good fruit is cut down and thrown into fire.
11
Ἐγὼ μὲν ⸂ὑμᾶς βαπτίζω⸃ ἐν ὕδατι εἰς μετάνοιαν· ὁ δὲ ὀπίσω μου ἐρχόμενος ἰσχυρότερός μού ἐστιν, οὗ οὐκ εἰμὶ ἱκανὸς τὰ ὑποδήματα βαστάσαι· αὐτὸς ὑμᾶς βαπτίσει ἐν πνεύματι ἁγίῳ ⸂καὶ πυρί⸃·
I baptize you in water for repentance; but the one coming behind me is stronger than I, whose sandals I am not fit to carry. He will baptize you in Holy Spirit and fire.
Why this rendering

Matt.3.11 Observation

Syntactic observation

Matthew gives baptism three materials — water (ἐν ὕδατι), and Holy Spirit and fire (ἐν πνεύματι ἁγίῳ καὶ πυρί). Mark 1:8 at the same point names water and Spirit and no fire. Luke 3:16 writes ἐν πνεύματι ἁγίῳ καὶ πυρί, as Matthew does — so **Mark alone lacks the fire.** All three books are inside this corpus, so the difference is verifiable by collation. And fire has already appeared twice in this paragraph — v.10, the fruitless tree thrown into fire; v.12, the chaff burned with πυρὶ ἀσβέστῳ, unquenchable fire. ἄσβεστος occurs three times in the corpus — here in Matthew, at Mark 9:43 (the unquenchable fire of Gehenna), and at Luke 3:17 in this same scene. So the fire of v.11 is the same word as the judging fire on either side of it, bound into one prepositional phrase with the Spirit. The ὀπίσω of ὀπίσω μου ἐρχόμενος, the one coming behind me, is the word that marks the disciple's place at Mark 1:17, 8:33, 8:34. SBLGNT marks a variant in this verse (⸂ὑμᾶς βαπτίζω⸃ ⸂καὶ πυρί⸃·).

Rendering options · 2

Adopted
“he will baptize you in Holy Spirit and fire” — the same word as the fire of vv.10 and 12

Basis Follows the base text and keeps fire as one word with the verses around it, leaving the reader to join them.

“in the Holy Spirit” — dropping fire to match Mark

Basis Harmonises the two gospels.

Rejected The fire is in the base text. And that of the three books only Mark wrote it differently is precisely what this corpus can show; harmonising deletes the datum.

12
οὗ τὸ πτύον ἐν τῇ χειρὶ αὐτοῦ, καὶ διακαθαριεῖ τὴν ἅλωνα αὐτοῦ καὶ συνάξει τὸν σῖτον αὐτοῦ εἰς τὴν ⸀ἀποθήκην, τὸ δὲ ἄχυρον κατακαύσει πυρὶ ἀσβέστῳ.
His winnowing fork is in his hand, and he will clear his threshing floor and gather his wheat into the barn; but the chaff he will burn with unquenchable fire.”
13
Τότε παραγίνεται ὁ Ἰησοῦς ἀπὸ τῆς Γαλιλαίας ἐπὶ τὸν Ἰορδάνην πρὸς τὸν Ἰωάννην τοῦ βαπτισθῆναι ὑπ’ αὐτοῦ.
Then Jesus comes from Galilee to the Jordan, to John, to be baptized by him.
14
ὁ δὲ ⸀Ἰωάννης διεκώλυεν αὐτὸν λέγων· Ἐγὼ χρείαν ἔχω ὑπὸ σοῦ βαπτισθῆναι, καὶ σὺ ἔρχῃ πρός με;
But John was preventing him, saying, “I have need to be baptized by you, and you come to me?”
15
ἀποκριθεὶς δὲ ὁ Ἰησοῦς εἶπεν ⸂πρὸς αὐτόν⸃· Ἄφες ἄρτι, οὕτως γὰρ πρέπον ἐστὶν ἡμῖν πληρῶσαι πᾶσαν δικαιοσύνην. τότε ἀφίησιν αὐτόν.
But answering, Jesus said to him, “Let it be so for now, for thus it is fitting for us to fulfil all righteousness.” Then he lets him.
Why this rendering

Matt.3.15 Observation

Syntactic observation

δικαιοσύνη occurs seven times in Matthew (3:15, 5:6, 5:10, 5:20, 6:1, 6:33, 21:32) and never in Mark; in this corpus Luke has it once (1:75) and John twice. The first words Jesus speaks in Matthew contain this word, and it becomes one of the book's key terms. πληρῶσαι, to fulfil or fill up, is the verb of the fulfilment citations in ch. 2 (πληρωθῇ) — there a prophecy is fulfilled, here a righteousness. And the subject is first person plural: ἡμῖν πληρῶσαι, for us to fulfil. Jesus binds himself and the Baptist together. The verse has no counterpart in Mark, whose 1:9 goes straight to the baptism with no exchange between them. πᾶσαν, all, stands before δικαιοσύνην and leaves the scope open. SBLGNT marks a variant in this verse (⸂πρὸς αὐτόν⸃·).

Rendering options · 2

Adopted
“for thus it is fitting for us to fulfil all righteousness”

Basis Keeps the first person plural and πληρόω, and fixes δικαιοσύνη to one word shared with chs. 5-6.

Paraphrase, e.g. “to fulfil what God requires”

Basis Unpacks the abstract noun for readability.

Rejected δικαιοσύνη recurs seven times in Matthew; unpacking it place by place hides the recurrence. Unpacked at its first occurrence, the link to 5:6, 5:10, 5:20 and 6:33 is broken from the start.

16
⸂βαπτισθεὶς δὲ⸃ ὁ Ἰησοῦς ⸂εὐθὺς ἀνέβη⸃ ἀπὸ τοῦ ὕδατος· καὶ ἰδοὺ ⸀ἠνεῴχθησαν οἱ οὐρανοί, καὶ εἶδεν ⸀πνεῦμα θεοῦ καταβαῖνον ὡσεὶ ⸀περιστερὰν ἐρχόμενον ἐπ’ αὐτόν·
And having been baptized, Jesus at once came up from the water; and look — the heavens were opened, and he saw the Spirit of God descending like a dove and coming upon him.
17
καὶ ἰδοὺ φωνὴ ἐκ τῶν οὐρανῶν λέγουσα· Οὗτός ἐστιν ὁ υἱός μου ὁ ἀγαπητός, ἐν ᾧ εὐδόκησα.
And look — a voice from the heavens, saying, “This is my beloved Son, in whom I am well pleased.”
Why this rendering

Matt.3.17 Observation

Syntactic observation

The voice from heaven speaks in the third person — Οὗτός ἐστιν, this is. At the same scene in Mark 1:11 it is second person — Σὺ εἶ ὁ υἱός μου, you are my Son. Luke 3:22 is second person too, Σὺ εἶ — so **Matthew alone writes it in the third person.** All three books are in this corpus, so the difference is verifiable by collation. The change of person changes where the words are aimed: in Mark they are spoken to Jesus; in Matthew they are spoken for the bystanders to hear. The following phrase shifts with it — Mark has ἐν σοὶ εὐδόκησα, in you I am well pleased; Matthew ἐν ᾧ εὐδόκησα, in whom. At the transfiguration, though, the two books converge again: Mark 9:7 and Matthew 17:5 both have the third-person Οὗτός ἐστιν. εὐδόκησα is aorist standing where a present state is meant — tense and sense apparently at odds.

Rendering options · 2

Adopted
“This is my beloved Son, in whom I am well pleased.” — kept distinct from Mark's you are

Basis Renders the person as written; that the two books use different persons must remain visible.

“You are my beloved Son” — matched to Mark

Basis Harmonises the two gospels.

Rejected It would change the person against the text. And showing differences of exactly this kind is part of why this corpus renders all four books — here it is Matthew that stands alone against the other two.

Lost in translation

the place of the aorist

εὐδόκησα is a point-tense read as a standing state. Korean and English must use a present, so the dissonance of tense does not register.